Who is really the best player in the world?

 

These days, wherever you look, there is always a debate about who is the best footballer among a certain pair of players. They put their pictures, goals, assists, achievements, speed, contribution to the team and the game as a whole, their skills, salaries, endorsement, and a host of other criteria.

Either player can be compared by any acclaimed expert at any time, and the one making the comparison claims that their สุดยอดนักเตะ, based on the criteria on which they base their comparison. But there is almost always a major flaw in ANY comparison, especially in a dynamic game like soccer. In general, I do not like the comparison, and this includes it in football.

People, including professionals and journalists, are often biased when comparing two quantities. Most of the time, the argument is biased in favor of an entity, depending on the preference and perspective of the person making the comparison.

When you compare two different players, it is disrespectful to both players. Usually the players being compared do not play for the same team, and the support and opinion of their teammates can affect the performance of the players and the final result of the match. It would have been easier if the players compared were on the same team, but this is rarely the case. Experts place two rival players next to each other, who have never played on the same team, and may never do, and compare them, neglecting other players on their respective teams.

For example, two players, soccer forwards A and B, can have the same scoring competition and can play the same position on the field. However, while forward A is fortunate to have a very tactical winger who dribbles and constantly passes and crosses to him, which can result in goals for him, forward B may lack the same fortune and may have to create your own opportunities and haggle. before scoring. At the end of the season, forward A scored 30 goals and was assisted in 20 of them, while his rival scores 20 and was assisted in just 5 of those goals, scoring the other 15 in a solo effort.

The press can exaggerate one over the other, claiming that the player with the highest number of goals is the best scorer, neglecting the role of teammates and supporting players. There is an inconsistency in your standard of comparison. Second, different player managers and the effect they have on players can cause them to implode or explode.

Two coaches can place their respective wingers in the same place in the formation, but each of them has a different responsibility on the field. One may be required to go through and enter the box, while the other may be required to send looped crosses to the box. The results will show that the guy who dribbles into the box will have more chances to score and show his skill than the guy who only has to throw crosses. If both players are compared, there is again an error in the standard of comparison. Tactics differ from team to team and from manager to manager.

Another factor in the two player comparison is the age factor. Ronaldo, Messi, Zlatan, Lewandowsky and Muller are all forwards, but they are not the same age. It would be more appropriate to compare them all when they are all the same age than to compare the scoring ramp of a 24-year-old player with a man ten years his senior.

Again, if you say, "Well, let's look at Zlatan when he was twenty-four and compare him to Neymar," several other factors must also be considered.

Physiological, psychological and emotional conditions must also be critically studied when comparing any two players. Does this player receive constant criticism from the press, friends and family, while the other is normally praised?

Depending on his mindset, the guy who is constantly criticized may work harder to silence his critics, or he may become frustrated and give up. Additionally, the boy who is also praised may be encouraged to do better, or he may become complacent and lose consistency.

Also, everyone is born with different strengths. Player A can be faster than Player B, while Player B has the advantage in terms of technique.

When you claim that one is better than the other simply because he can run faster, he must also conclude that the other is better because his technique is superior. For performance-based comparison, all strengths and weaknesses should be considered, and an average should be drawn, rather than relying on a single criterion.